Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Burning Interest in Punitive Damages

In Massachusetts yesterday a jury awarded 71 million dollars when they found a tobacco company liable for the death of Marie Evans. The full story can be found in the Boston Globe, among other places. It turns out that the tobacco company in question, "Lorillard had never lost a case brought by an individual before yesterday" While the tobacco company is appealing the case, there is speculation that more cases may follow as a result of this one.

Apparently "the verdict sets up a second phase of deliberations in which the jury could also award Evans’s estate and family punitive damages, which often are a multiple of the amounts awarded in the compensatory phase." Insurance coverage for punitive damages is actually an interesting topic. By interesting, I mean it is a topic that is worthy of many articles full of discussion as well as a few books. Clearly we don't have the space to explore all of the ramifications here in a little blog post, but a section from The Thomson West Publication: Punitive Damages Law and Practice by John J. Kircher and Christine M. Wiseman sheds some light on how convoluted a topic it is.
The question of insurance coverage for punitive damages continues to plague the courts, insurers, and insureds. The trend appears to favor finding coverage, but the decisions have not persuasively decided the issue. In fact, they have more recently enhanced the controversy by positing additional arguments both in support of and in opposition to coverage. (pp 7-38-7-39)

They go on to discuss the reasoning behind punitive damages and explore whether insurance coverage hinders those motives:

In most jurisdictions, punitive damages are intended to be awarded not to compensate the injured, but to punish the wrongdoer and to deter the wrongdoer and others from similar egregious conduct. Once it is determined that punitive damages are covered by the policy terms, courts then face the issue whether coverage would frustrate the public policy involved in the punishment and deterrence considerations of the punitive damages. (pp 7-42-7-43)

If you're interested in more information on punitive damages or products liability, please feel free to email the library with your specific question or stop by and check out our collection.

No comments:

Post a Comment